🔥🔥🔥 Check out the simultaneous publication on the NSTEMI vs STEMI subanalysis of FIRE Trial JACC Journals 🗣️Consistent benefit of physiology-guided complete revasc in NSTEMI and STEMI patients!

MIЯVΛƬ #IC European Society of Cardiology PCRonline 🫀 NEJM Salvatore Brugaletta Khaled AlShaibi Didier Tchetche Victoria Delgado Javier Escaned Ritu Thamman MD Aditya Bharadwaj Tom Johnson Nieves Gonzalo Fascinating study in light of previous research. Of note, in subgroup analysis, all of the benefit was in patients with an angiographic stenosis of 90% or more.

Complete vs Culprit-Only Revascularization in Older Patients With Myocardial Infarction With or Without ST-Segment Elevation | Journal of the American College of Cardiology jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.…

💥#ESCCongress Day 3️⃣💥 🔥 HOT LINE 8️⃣ ⏰ 1 Sep // 16:15-17:21 📍 London 👉 SENIOR RITA 👉 EARTH-STEMI 👉 SCOFF Dr Roxana Mehran ESC President Robert Byrne Professor Vijay Kunadian Simone Biscaglia Gianluca Campo David Ferreira #EAPCI European Society of Cardiology

Be careful that in patients with high IMR, FFR could be increased. This could be important in borderline FFR. #FullPhysiology is essential! #ESCCongress

In ANOCA patients MRR and CFR are interchangeable. #ESCCongress

Professor Vijay Kunadian presents results of SENIOR RITA: an invasive strategy did not reduce composite 1ry endpoint of CV death or nonfatal MI than a conservative strategy in older NSTEMI pts NEJM simpub: nej.md/4fZIG9z #ESCCongress European Society of Cardiology MIЯVΛƬ #IC Amardeep Dastidar

Simone Biscaglia

Excellent discussion of SENIOR RITA by Simone Biscaglia FIRE Trial #ESCCongress European Society of Cardiology

#SENIOR- RITA #ESCCongress Professor Vijay Kunadian Dr Roxana Mehran 🎯older patients w/NSTEMI 🔎No sign difference invasive vs conservative approach 🩸 not sign ❓subgroup with most benefit from invasive approach

#SimPub #CircESC2024 In a patient-level meta-analysis of older adults presenting with STEMI, complete revascularization was associated with a reduction in death, MI or revascularisation compared to culprit-only PCI Gianluca Campo ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CI…

Results of EARTH STEMI by Gianluca Campo In this large meta-analysis, in older pts with MI+MVD, complete revascularisation ⬇️ CV events compared with culprit-only revasc at 4 years. Similar safety profile in both groups #ESCCongress European Society of Cardiology

#ESC2024 European Society of Cardiology FAME 2: 10-year follow-up 🏪 PCI is 25% more likely to lead to better outcomes than medical therapy alone 🔑 48% of patients were tied. Nearly half the time, it won't make a big difference which one you choose. PCRonline 🫀 CoreAalst OLV HartcentrumAalst Optima Education

Hotline #ESC2024 🌎EARTH STEMI 🎯7 RCTs 🎯1733 older MVD STEMI patients (complete vs culprit only revasc) 🎯complete revascularization reduced the primary endpoint [death+MI+ID-revasc] up to 4 years 👏🏻👏🏻 Gianluca Campo Simone Biscaglia ritapavasini

From 🇮🇹 to 🇬🇧 another step forward for a great team ... starting from our Professor Ferrari to our fellows... see you in 🇪🇸 Madrid 2025

🌍 EARTH-STEMI #ESCCongress 🔥 The benefits of complete revascularization now confirmed in older patients with STEMI in an updated IPD meta-analysis 📊 Gianluca Campo Simone Biscaglia European Society of Cardiology European Society of Cardiology Journals #ESC #ESCCongress2024 #Cardiology

#ESCCongress 🇬🇧 2024 Aaysha Cader interviews 🎤 Gianluca Campo about the results of the EARTH 🌐-STEMI trial: Complete vs. culprit-only revascularisation in older #STEMI patients ➡️pcronline.com/News/Whats-new… #interventionalcardiology

Special thanks to all 🌎 #STEMI investigators. Complete vs. Culprit-Only Revascularization in Older Patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An I… pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39217603/